Thanks for Contributing! You just created a new WN page. Learn more »
If consciousness is just the workings of neurons and synapses, how do we explain the phenomenon of near-death experience? By some accounts, about 3% of the U...
Income inequality has been on the rise for decades. In the last 30 years, the wages of the top 1% have grown by 154%, while the bottom 90% has seen growth of only 17%. As the rungs of the economic ladder move further and further apart, conventional wisdom says that it will become much more difficult to climb them. Opportunities for upward mobility-the American dream-will disappear as the deck becomes stacked against the middle class and the poor. But others see inequality as a positive, a sign of a dynamic and robust economy that, in the end, helps everyone. And contrary to public opinion, mobility has remained stable over the past few decades. If the American dream is dying, is it the result of income inequality? Or is disparity in income a red herring where more complex issues are at play?
Intelligence Squared U.S. Presents "Legalize Drugs" with Paul Butler and Nick Gillespie for the motion, Asa Hutchinson and Theodore Dalrymple against the motion. Moderated by John Donvan. It was 1971 when President Richard Nixon declared a "war on drugs." $2.5 trillion dollars later, drug use is half of what it was 30 years ago, and thousands of offenders are successfully diverted to treatment instead of jail. And yet, 22 million Americans-9% of the population-still uses illegal drugs, and with the highest incarceration rate in the world, we continue to fill our prisons with drug offenders. Decimated families and communities are left in the wake. Is it time to legalize drugs or is this a war that we're winning? For: Paul Butler For: Nick Gillespie Against; Asa Hutchinson Against: Theodore Dalrymple Like on us Facebook: http://bit.ly/IQ2onFacebook Tweet at us: http://bit.ly/IQ2Twitter Subscribe to us: http://bit.ly/IQ2onYouTube
October 6, 2010 Is the rise of terrorism and violence justifiably traced to the teachings of Islam, or is this call to war a twisted interpretation of the tr...
On September 23, 2011, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas appeared before the U.N. General Assembly to request full membership for the State of Palestine. A...
The first attempt at establishing a national minimum wage, a part of 1933's sweeping National Industrial Recovery Act, was struck down by the Supreme Court i...
According to a 2009 poll, around 1% of American adults reported being vegan. In 2011 that number rose to 2.5%--more than double, but still dwarfed by the 48%...
In a modern, post-industrial economy that seems better suited to women than men, many are wondering if men have been permanently left behind. Education and e...
On the fundamental question--evolution or creation?--Americans are on the fence. According to one survey, while 61% of Americans believe we have evolved over...
Imagine a world free of genetic diseases, where parents control their offspring's height, eye color and intelligence. The science may be closer than you thin...
Israel believes America's special relationship is vital. It is, certainly, to Israel. But what about for the US? Israel has no oil, enemies in many places, a...
Robert Reich and Mark Zandi debate Glenn Hubbard and Arthur Laffer on the topic: The Rich Are Taxed Enough. Moderated by John Donvan. How do we fix the economy? The U.S. government's budget deficit is nearing a trillion dollars for the fourth straight year and unemployment remains high. With the Bush-era tax cuts that are set to expire at the end of 2012, what is the best move for continued economic recovery? President Obama says we should raise taxes on those making more than $250,000 to reduce the deficit. Others say that the richest 1% already pay more than a quarter of all federal taxes and higher taxes for job creators would slow economic growth. Are the nation's wealthiest not paying their "fair share," or should tax breaks be extended for everyone in the name of job creation? For: Glenn Hubbard For: Arthur Laffer Against: Robert Reich Against: Mark Zandi Like on us Facebook: http://bit.ly/IQ2onFacebook Tweet at us: http://bit.ly/IQ2Twitter Subscribe to us: http://bit.ly/IQ2onYouTube
The complete 2 hour debate which includes all the Q&A; session etc. THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS A FORCE FOR GOOD IN THE WORLD For the motion: Archbishop John Onaiy...
Genetically modified (GM) foods have been around for decades. Created by modifying the DNA of one organism through the introduction of genes from another, they are developed for a number of different reasons-to fight disease, enhance flavor, resist pests, improve nutrition, survive drought-and are mainly found in our food supply in processed foods using corn, soybeans, and sugar beets, and as feed for farm animals. Across the country and around the world, communities are fighting the cultivation of genetically engineered crops. Are they safe? How do they impact the environment? Can they improve food security? Is the world better off with or without GM food?
The rise of ISIS, the disintegration of Iraq, Syria’s ongoing civil war, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the promise and peril of the Arab Spring... What role should America play in the Middle East? For some, America’s restraint has been a sign of disciplined leadership. But for others, it has been a sign of diminished strength and influence. How do we strike a balance between our national interests, moral obligations, and the maintenance of world order? Are we simply recognizing the limitations of our power, or does this embattled region require a bolder, more muscular, American presence?
April 21, 2009 The goal of IQ2 US is to raise the level of public discourse on our most challenging issues. To provide a new forum for intelligent discussion...
A part of the Chicago Ideas Week, this debate is the first Intelligence Squared U.S. debate to be held live in Chicago. The herd mentality that assumes colle...
The Motion ~ "The Catholic Church is a force for good in the world". Christopher Hitchens and Stephen Fry, opposing the motion, comprehensively trounced Arch...
On the fundamental question--evolution or creation?--Americans are on the fence. According to one survey, while 61% of Americans believe we have evolved over time, 22% believe this evolution was guided by a higher power, with another 31% on the side of creationism. For some, modern science debunks many of religion's core beliefs, but for others, questions like "Why are we here?" and "How did it all come about?" can only be answered through a belief in the existence of God. Can science and religion co-exist? For: Lawrence Krauss For: Michael Shermer Against: Ian Hutchinson Against: Dinesh D'Souza Like on us Facebook: http://bit.ly/IQ2onFacebook Tweet at us: http://bit.ly/IQ2Twitter Subscribe to us: http://bit.ly/IQ2onYouTube
"A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." -2nd Amendment Recent mass shooting tragedies have renewed the national debate over the 2nd Amendment. Gun ownership and homicide rates are higher in the U.S. than in any other developed nation, but gun violence has decreased over the last two decades even as gun ownership may be increasing. Over 200 years have passed since James Madison introduced the Bill of Rights, the country has changed, and so have it guns. Is the right to bear arms now at odds with the common good, or is it as necessary today as it was in 1789?
Edit: In response to a common statement that this isn't the 2 hour version - I must admit that I was being quite liberal with the title description. This is ...
May 3, 2011 America, built up by the hard work of its immigrants, now finds itself home to an estimated 11 million illegal immigrants. The federal government...
Affirmative action, when used as a factor in college admissions, is meant to foster diversity and provide equal opportunities in education for underrepresent...
In the words of Blaise Pascal, mathematician and Catholic, "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from a religious conviction." D...
Christopher Hitchens was on The Hour on May12 2009, interviewed by George Stroumboulopoulos.
"Say it isn't so!" The BBC's and arguably the world's foremost TV interviewer announces he will leave Newsnight April 20, 2014 http://www.bbc.com/news/entert...
In the first half, Christopher Hitchens talks to Tony Jones about living with cancer and not seeing any valid reason to change his beliefs close to death. In...
April 22, 2011. Laurie Taylor questioned the terminally-ill atheist and writer about the Iraq War, his rivalry with brother Peter, Christianity and the score...
http://www.cbc.ca/Q Writer, political commentator and author of 'god is not Great' sits down with host Jian Ghomeshi to kick around the idea of adding three ...
Christopher Hitchens Interview John And Tom Metzger in 1991 Neo Nazi Racism Racist.
Part 1: Author, journalist, and public intellectual Christopher Hitchens is a contributing editor to Vanity Fair and the author of numerous books, including the controversial best seller God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything and, most recently, Hitch-22: A Memoir. In this, the first part of a two-part interview, Hitchens speaks about his personal life: his education at a British private school and at Oxford University and his parent's mismatched marriage. His discusses his mother's suicide and his discovery after her death that she was Jewish. He also discusses his devotion to progressive causes, his intellectual appreciation of doubt and uncertainty, and his opposition to totalitarianism and all forms of absolutism. On a lighter note, he speaks of his Friday lunches with writer friends, including James Fenton and Martin Amis. Part 2: Author, journalist, and public intellectual Christopher Hitchens is a contributing editor to Vanity Fair and the author of many books, including the controversial best seller God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything and, most recently, Hitch-22: A Memoir. In this, the second part of a two-part interview, Hitchens speaks mostly about politics. He notes that he was known for his political militancy during his years at Oxford University, and identifies himself as the product of 1968: an activist during the last gasp of the socialist movement. He speaks critically of Bill Clinton, and admiringly of Margaret Thatcher and Somalian dissident Hirsi Ali. Hitchens discusses his support of the Iraq war and the necessity of overthrowing Saddam Hussein. He also discusses his book, God Is Not Great, and notes that most of the mail he receives in response to his atheism has been positive. He also asserts his respect for Marxism as a viable system for interpreting history.
Christopher Hitchens sat down with PlumTV's Jage Toba for a casual half-hour interview. Hitchens spoke on a variety of topics ranging from religion and politics to Monty Python and Orwell. May 28, 2008
Laurie Taylor interviews writer and broadcaster Christopher Hitchens, who discusses how his political beliefs changed over the years, revealing why Ayatollah Khomeini's 1989 fatwa on author Salman Rushdie represented a turning point in his life. He also talks about his atheist beliefs, his support for the war in Iraq and his rivalry with his brother Peter, as well as sharing his thoughts on being diagnosed with terminal cancer.
George Packer (born August 13, 1960) is an American journalist, novelist, and playwright. He is perhaps best known for his writings for The New Yorker about ...
By Request... Author and Journalist Christopher Hitchens speaks with Greg about his new book: "God is not great: How religion poisons everything" http://www....
January 23, 2011 C-SPAN http://MOXNews.com/ Christopher Hitchens is the author of over a dozen books including his recent memoir, Hitch-22. Other titles incl...
His parents, Eric Ernest and Yvonne Jean (Hickman) Hitchens, met in Scotland when both were serving in the Royal Navy during World War II. His mother was a "Wren" (a member of the Women's Royal Naval Service), and his father an officer aboard the cruiser HMS Jamaica, which helped sink Nazi Germany's battleship Scharnhorst in the Battle of the North Cape. His father's naval career required the family to move a number of times from base to base throughout Britain and its dependencies, including in Malta, where Christopher's brother Peter was born in Sliema in 1951. Hitchens's mother, arguing "if there is going to be an upper class in this country, then Christopher is going to be in it",[18] sent him to Mount House School in Tavistock in Devon at the age of eight, followed by the independent Leys School in Cambridge, and finally Balliol College, Oxford, where he was tutored by Steven Lukes and read philosophy, politics, and economics. Hitchens was "bowled over" in his adolescence by Richard Llewellyn's How Green Was My Valley, Arthur Koestler's Darkness at Noon, Fyodor Dostoyevsky's Crime and Punishment, R. H. Tawney's critique on Religion and the Rise of Capitalism, and the works of George Orwell.[17] In 1968, he took part in the TV quiz show University Challenge.[19] In the 1960s, Hitchens joined the political left, drawn by his anger over the Vietnam War, nuclear weapons, racism, and oligarchy, including that of "the unaccountable corporation". He expressed affinity with the politically charged countercultural and protest movements of the 1960s and 1970s. However, he deplored the recreational drug use of the time, which he described as hedonistic.[20] He joined the Labour Party in 1965, but along with the majority of the Labour students' organisation was expelled in 1967, because of what Hitchens called "Prime Minister Harold Wilson's contemptible support for the war in Vietnam".[21][clarification needed] Under the influence of Peter Sedgwick, who translated the writings of Russian revolutionary and Soviet dissident Victor Serge, Hitchens forged an ideological interest in Trotskyist and anti-Stalinist socialism.[17] Shortly after he joined "a small but growing post-Trotskyist Luxemburgist sect".[22] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_hitchens
An interview of Christopher Hitchens on French TV that covers many of the topics Hitchens is famous for. Interview opens with a discussion about his book God...
Christopher Hitchens, contributing editor to Vanity Fair and the Atlantic Monthly, discusses his current paperback, "God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons E...
Christopher Hitchens
Charlie Rose interviews Christopher Hitchens about his book "God Is Not Great."
Julian Morrow interviewed Christopher Hitchens during the Sydney Writers' Festival 2010 on ABC.
Christopher Hitchens in Asylum's segment 'Drinks with writers'. Credit to Asylum.com: http://www.asylum.com/2010/06/22/christopher-hitchens-hitch-22-drinks-w...
Aired July 13, 2010.
This is an old radio interview of Christopher Hitchens from The Steve Kane Show recorded on April 7, 2009 after debating William Lane Craig. It is a sweet little gem. Enjoy!
Steve Kroft profiles Vanity Fair columnist, author and public intellectual Christopher Hitchens, for whom nothing is off-limits when making his wry and often...
A discussion about the life and work of author Christopher Hitchens with his friends and fellow authors: Salman Rushdie, Martin Amis, James Fenton & Ian McEw...
What is college for? For many, it's a time for personal and intellectual growth, to meet new people, and to explore ideas and philosophies that challenge their beliefs. Or is it? Recent cancellations of conservative speakers, rescinded honorary degrees, and scrutiny of certain campus groups have heightened perceptions that there is pervasive liberal intolerance on campuses. Are liberals shutting down speech and debate on campus? Or is this theory a myth, based on the preponderance of liberals at universities rather than intentionally discriminatory actions?
GENETICALLY MODIFY FOOD: Robert Rosenkranz Debate Introduction for Intelligence Squared US Debate Introduction with Robert Rosenkranz and John Donvan WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2014 Genetically modified (GM) foods have been around for decades. Created by modifying the DNA of one organism through the introduction of genes from another, they are developed for a number of different reasons—to fight disease, enhance flavor, resist pests, improve nutrition, survive drought—and are mainly found in our food supply in processed foods using corn, soybeans, and sugar beets, and as feed for farm animals. Across the country and around the world, communities are fighting the cultivation of genetically engineered crops. Are they safe? How do they impact the environment? Can they improve food security? Is the world better off with or without GM food? FOR Robert Fraley Executive VP & Chief Technology Officer, Monsanto FOR Alison Van Eenennaam Genomics and Biotechnology Researcher, UC Davis AGAINST Charles Benbrook Research Professor, Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources AGAINST Margaret Mellon Science Policy Consultant & Fmr. Senior Scientist, Union of Concerned Scientists Moderator Image MODERATOR John Donvan Author & Correspondent for ABC News
Should the World Bet on America America owes $6 trillion to China, our sprawling military complex often appears helpless against disparate threats abroad, and the War on Terror has stripped us of the moral high ground. Washington is paralyzed by bitter partisanship, our children are falling behind their international peers, and our middle class is no longer the world’s most affluent. But we’ve been warned about America’s decline before. Remember Sputnik? Yes, times are tough, but America is recovering from the Great Recession faster than almost any other advanced country, an energy boom could add billions to the GDP, we’re still a leader in technological innovation, and our military strength and geopolitical advantages remain unrivaled. Are our best days behind us, or should the world still bet on America?
America owes $6 trillion to China, our sprawling military complex often appears helpless against disparate threats abroad, and the War on Terror has stripped us of the moral high ground. Washington is paralyzed by bitter partisanship, our children are falling behind their international peers, and our middle class is no longer the world's most affluent. But we've been warned about America's decline before. Remember Sputnik? Yes, times are tough, but America is recovering from the Great Recession faster than any other advanced country, an energy boom could add billions to the GDP, we're still a leader in technological innovation, and our military strength and geopolitical advantages remain unrivaled. Are our best days behind us, or should the world still bet on America?
Baba Brinkman performs at the 100th Intelligence Squared U.S. Debate.
We here at Intelligence Squared want to say something about David Carr. And it's this: David stood out to us. After producing 100 debates and booking more than 400 panelists, David was among the few that we always talked about afterward. Not only as having stolen the show with a nice little stunt – but also for having just been a damn fine honest witty intelligent debater. We wanted to have him back someday. We waited too long. But we have this that we can share: a podcast and video tribute to David from his debate, "Good Riddance To Mainstream Media." Thank you David Carr. Rest In Peace. And condolences from all of us at Intelligence Squared US to those who loved you, and they were many.
An IQ2US Tribute to David Carr Upon hearing the news of the sudden passing of The New York Times's David Carr on February 12th, 2015, we assembled this rememberance. David appeared on our stage on October 27, 2009 arguing against the debate motion: Good Riddance to Mainstream Media.
Christopher Hitchens ,2009 ,Intelligence ,Squared ,Debate ,Stephen Fry
Canadian MP Chrystia Freeland and Stanford Fellow Josef Joffe spar over the quality of American education and access and opportunity for the middle and lower class.
Stephen Fry and Christopher Hitchens The Intelligence Squared - antitheist atheist . The complete 2 hour debate which includes all the Q&A session etc. THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS A FORCE FOR GOOD IN THE WORLD For the motion: Archbishop John Onaiy. im mirroring it, because i have a feeling that this debate will turn legendary. earlier i already mirrored Christopher Hitchens contribution to this debate, . Stephen Fry Catholic Church is Not a Force for Good. - Antitheist atheist A renewed old post of Stephen fry at the intelligence squared debate, good quality .
The complete 2 hour debate which includes all the Q&A session etc. THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS A FORCE FOR GOOD IN THE WORLD For the motion: Archbishop John Onaiy. In response to a common statement that this isnt the 2 hour version - I must admit that I was being quite liberal with the title description. This is .
We live in the foodie age – where celebrity chefs are the new rock stars. But while organic food is a must-have fashion accessory, obesity and food intolerances are on the rise. But there are good things on the boil in the world of food, too – for instance, fair trade and carbon footprints are increasingly considered when making our food purchasing decisions. Has our food obsession gone too far? Or can food become a vehicle to drive social change? Watch the debate and explore the issues. For the proposition: · Matthew Evans – former chef and food critic turned Tasmanian smallholder · Katy Barfield – former CEO, SecondBite · Wendy Harmer – comedian, journalist, author and 2009 Celebrity Masterchef contestant Against the proposition: · Alla Wolf-Tasker – executive chef and co-owner of the acclaimed Lake House restaurant · Richard Cornish – food writer and commentator focussed on sustainability · Fuchsia Dunlop – British food writer and chef specialising in Chinese cuisine
These days, classrooms seem packed with children who report to the office to take medication at lunchtimes – or whose behaviour problems come with labels that didn’t exist when their parents were young. Kids who can’t sit still have ADHD, kids with trouble making friends have Asperger’s Syndrome, and even cleverness comes with a measurable label: Gifted. When did eccentricity, naughtiness and other behaviours become medicalised, rather than part of the normal variation of human behaviour? Do all these categories help more than they hinder? And why are asthma, autism and allergies all on the rise? Divisions are everywhere – on whether the rise in childhood ailments is due to better detection, environmental contaminants or a blend of both; and on whether medication is an answer, and if so, how soon (and how much). Our speakers take the pulse of the situation – and offer competing diagnoses to get to the heart of the problem. Wheeler Centre director Michael Williams chairs the debate. Speakers for the proposition are: Jane Caro - Author, broadcaster and award-winning advertising writer Martin Whitely - Recently retired WA politician, teacher and author of Speed Up and Sit Still: The Controversies of ADHD Jon Jureidini - Child psychiatrist, professor in psychiatry and paediatrics at Adelaide University and spokesman for Healthy Skepticism Speakers against the proposition include: Nicole Rogerson - CEO of Autism Awareness Australia and director of the Lizard Children’s Centre Katie Allen - Paediatric Gastroenterologist and Allergist in the field of Food Allergy at Melbourne’s Royal Children’s Hospital and co-author of Kids' Food Allergy for Dummies Jane Burns - Public health academic and advocate, and CEO of Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre …plus your questions from the floor.
Climate change is intensifying, but along with the repeal of the carbon tax, the price of coal has dropped – making it more appealing as an energy source. What lies ahead … for Australia and the world? The Australian economy is largely propped up by coal, but is the end in sight? Is China, for instance, as reliant on Australian coal as we’re led to believe? And while many in the industry accept the science around climate change, what are the viable alternatives of energy supply to developing countries – is coal the only affordable option for those striving to escape poverty and destitution? Renewable energy has not yet been developed at a rate (and for a price) that makes it a viable large-scale substitute for coal. Which begs the question: is our whole model flawed? The future of energy distribution could be local rather than centralised, with rooftops, co-generation plants and other small-scale technologies playing a vital role – avoiding the need for large systems of infrastructure for distribution. Looking beyond the nuts and bolts of technology, what is the impact on communities of moving away from coal? Are we indifferent to the eclipse of the long history of coal mining? And what will happen to the communities that were once defined by it? This debate was moderated by Wheeler Centre director Michael Williams. Speaking for the proposition · Bob Brown, former leader of the Australian Greens · Professor Mike Sandiford, director Melbourne Energy Institute · Lane Crockett, Executive General Manager, Pacific Hydro Speaking against the proposition · Dr Richard Aldous, CEO CO2CRC · Dr Nikki Williams, former head of the Australian Coal Association · Sinclair Davidson, professor of institutional economics at the School of Economics, Finance and Marketing RMIT, and senior fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs Intelligence Squared Debates Our Intelligence Squared debates broach society’s major questions – with knowledgeable, passionate panellists discussing polarising and very relevant dilemmas. In these highly participatory events, each team has equal time to make their arguments. When all is said, the victor depends entirely on your vote.
From child soldiers in Sudan to gang violence in Papua New Guinea; tsunamis in the Pacific to earthquakes in New Zealand, we’re confronted with communities in need every day. Who should we help? How can we be sure our aid dollars reach their destination? Some believe that aid traps communities in a cycle of dependence, holding them back from developing their own systems and managing their own issues. So on balance, do those dollars hurt more than they help? And with endemic poverty in Australia’s indigenous communities and natural disaster breaking Queensland’s budget – should we ‘take care of our own’ first? Arguing that the aid dollar is a waste of money is Greg Sheridan, the Australian’s foreign editor; James Goodman, Associate Professor at UTS’ Social and Political Change group and Tim Wilson, currently director of the Intellectual and Free Trade Unit at the Institute of Public Affairs. And on the opposing team, arguing that aid is anything but a waste, is Samah Hadid, a human rights activist; Andrew Hewett, Executive Director of Oxfam Australia and Martin Thomas of World Vision, Australia. Simon Longstaff, from the St James Ethics Centre, acts as moderator.
In this debate, chaired by Wheeler Centre director Michael Williams, our speakers consider the obstacles and opportunities of copyright today – and tomorrow. With panellists Angela Daly, Simon Groth, Suelette Dreyfus, Michael Fraser, Lori Flekser and Elmo Keep. The digital revolution is counter-intuitive to copyright. Technological change is moving too fast for adequate laws to be implemented – and for affected industries to keep pace. The bottom is dropping out of the Hollywood box office, while television stations are being hammered by free-falling ratings for blockbuster shows (think: Homeland). We’re watching in droves, but many of us are not paying for what we watch, and we’re too impatient to wait for traditional delivery systems. Meanwhile, in book publishing, the e-revolution is seeing the boom of digital publishing – and pirated books. Will it go the way of the music industry? With such open access to information these days, how do we know where one person’s work ends and another begins? Is the very idea of intellectual property becoming a nonsense – or is it too important to give up on, for the continuing functioning of the arts and the sciences? And – the million-dollar question – how can we ensure creativity continues to pay?
By the late 19th century, all Australian colonies had decreed that education must be compulsory, free and secular. By the middle of the twentieth century, ‘secular’ had gone out of fashion, seeing special religious instruction in all states. Today most primary schools in Australia must allow for special religious instruction. Was the old legislation insisting on secularity out of touch with modern times, or is it more relevant than ever? Is it possible to teach children about the importance of faith without proselytising, and if so, where should the boundaries be drawn? Does faith-based religious education have a place in public schools? Results No spoilers on this page, but if you’d like to jump to the results of the debate, you’ll find them here.
Death is the most personal of matters, but it’s also a political hot potato. Most of us don’t choose (or even expect) the way in which we die, but for the terminally ill, death is a looming certainty to be dealt with. And as humans live longer – largely thanks to the interventions of modern medicine – we’re more likely to die of serious illness, and to have our deaths medically postponed. There has long been a call for governments to grant us the right to choose our own death, by legalising euthanasia. But what are the circumstances in which this right should be granted? Who gets to decide – and when? And then there’s the sobering knowledge that this is one life decision that can’t be reversed. From medicos to philosophers, politicians to law enforcers, the terminally ill to their loved ones, this one issue we all have an opinion on – and a possible stake in. Speakers for the motion include Beth Wilson, the outgoing Victorian Health Services Commissioner, Professor Loane Skene, an ethicist at the University of Melbourne, and Dr Philip Nitschke, the founding director of pro-euthanasia group Exit International. Speakers against the motion include Dr Shakira Hussein, from the Asia Institute at University of Melbourne, Scott Stephens, religion and ethics editor for ABC Online, and Associate Professor Bill Silvester, Director Respecting Patient Choices Program at the Austin Hospital, and Intensive Care Specialist.
The plucky bravery of the Anzacs is one of our great national stories – it plays into our idea of who we are. But why is one of the touchstones of our identity based on a historic defeat? Some are sick of the mantras of Anzac and mateship, while others believe worship of soldiers is inappropriate in an era when we’re still at war in Afghanistan. Are we becoming warmongers – or recognising the sacrifice of our defence personnel? Our diverse panel – including historians, war reporters and former Army personnel – argue some of the thorny issues. For the proposition: · Professor Marilyn Lake – historian and author of What’s Wrong with Anzac · Graham Wilson – formerly of the Australian Army and Department of Defence, now a historian and writer · Jeff Sparrow – writer and editor of Overland Against the proposition: · Dr Brendan Nelson – director of the Australian War Memorial and former ambassador and politician · John Martinkus – conflict zone journalist and cinematographer · Brigadier Nicholas Jans – Australian Army veteran, Army Reservist and Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Defence Leadership & Ethics at ADFA
Is Amazon the Reader's Friend In late 2014, Amazon and the publishing house Hachette settled a months-long dispute over who should set the price for e-books. In Amazon’s view, lower prices mean more sales and more readers, and that benefits everyone. But for publishers, the price of an e-book must reflect the investment made, from the author’s advance to a book’s production. The conflict, resolved for now, has only raised more questions about the value of books, Amazon’s business practices, and the role of publishers. Is book publishing an oligopoly, a dinosaur in need of disruption? Is Amazon, which accounts for 41% of all new book and 67% of all e-book sales, a monopoly? Who is doing right by readers and the future of books?
Too often, the big issues feel ill-served by parliamentary question time or the 24-hour news cycle. Big issues and bigger ideas deserve informed and passionate consideration. Beyond the soundbites, beyond the sloganeering, beyond the posturing, there’s the debate. In this Intelligence Squared Debate, held at Melbourne Town Hall, our panellists argue for and against the proposition that ‘Freedom of Speech is Over-Rated’. Arguing for the proposition are Marcia Langton, Catherine Deveny and Michael Gawenda. Speaking for the opposing side are Arnold Zable, Gretel Killeen and Julian Burnside.
Intelligence Squared’s 2012 series of debates kicks off with a look at the ethics of eating meat. Six speakers are divided into two teams for lively and insightful arguments for and against the proposition, ‘Animals Should Be Off the Menu’. Speaking for the proposition are Peter Singer, Philip Wollen and Veronica Ridge; against it, Adrian Richardson, Fiona Chambers and Bruce McGregor. Their cases are followed by questions from the floor and finally, the audience vote. For analysis of the event – including a transcript of audience vote results – read our article covering the debate.
Hosting The Irish Times debate final ... Email debates@irishtimes ... The Irish Times Debate, Belfast 2013.
The Irish Times 2015-03-27Arkansas State University ) A-State Debate Team Newcomer Wins Championship ... In IPDA team debate, the ...
noodls 2015-03-27on Presidential Debates, Inc ... West Virginia group pitches hosting of 2016 Presidential debate ... debate.
noodls 2015-03-27Cameron may have won, but he did so narrowly – and this is where considering pre-debate expectations is important.
The Guardian 2015-03-27What we saw last night wasn't a debate ... With a week to go, let's have that head-to-head debate.
Belfast Telegraph 2015-03-27"You have called for an open debate ... and time for the open debate," the 77-year-old campaigner said.
DNA India 2015-03-27The RA SCPEC Annual Action Plan was debated. The parliament continued debating the State Commission ...
noodls 2015-03-27... an open debate with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the issue. "You have called for an open debate.
The Siasat Daily 2015-03-27Channel 4 did not have a leaders’ debate in 2010, so straight comparisons with five years ago are not possible.
The Guardian 2015-03-27... they were right to avoid a head-to-head debate," he said ... Party leaders' TV debate schedule revealed.
The Independent 2015-03-27Party leaders' TV debate schedule revealed ... In a tweet after the debate she said: "I see JP and I are ...
The Independent 2015-03-27"In contrast, the amendments you have brought to this law have completely bypassed any debate or discussion.
Deccan Herald 2015-03-27"In contrast, the amendments you have brought to this law have completely bypassed any debate or discussion.
Deccan Herald 2015-03-27Christopher Eric Hitchens (13 April 1949 – 15 December 2011) was an English American author and journalist whose career spanned more than four decades. Hitchens, often referred to colloquially as "Hitch", was a columnist and literary critic for New Statesman, The Atlantic, The Nation, The Daily Mirror, The Times Literary Supplement and Vanity Fair. He was an author of twelve books and five collections of essays. As a staple of talk shows and lecture circuits, he was a prominent public intellectual, and his confrontational style of debate made him both a lauded and controversial figure.
Hitchens was known for his admiration of George Orwell, Thomas Paine and Thomas Jefferson, as well as for his excoriating critiques of various public figures including Mother Teresa, Bill Clinton, Henry Kissinger and Diana, Princess of Wales. Although he supported the Falklands War, his key split from the established political left began in 1989 after what he called the "tepid reaction" of the Western left to the Rushdie Affair. The September 11 attacks strengthened his internationalist embrace of an interventionist foreign policy, and his vociferous criticism of what he called "fascism with an Islamic face." His numerous editorials in support of the Iraq War caused some to label him a neoconservative, although Hitchens insisted he was not "a conservative of any kind", and his friend Ian McEwan describes him as representing the anti-totalitarian left.
Stephen John Fry (born 24 August 1957) is an English actor, screenwriter, author, playwright, journalist, poet, comedian, television presenter, film director, and a director of Norwich City Football Club.
After a troubled childhood and adolescence, during which he was expelled from a number of schools and eventually spent three months in prison for credit card fraud, he was able to secure a place at Queens' College, Cambridge, where he studied English Literature.
He first came to public attention in the 1981 Cambridge Footlights Revue presentation "The Cellar Tapes", which also included Hugh Laurie, Emma Thompson and Tony Slattery. With Hugh Laurie, as the comedy double act Fry and Laurie, he co-wrote and co-starred in A Bit of Fry & Laurie, and took the role of Jeeves (with Laurie playing Wooster) in Jeeves and Wooster.
As an actor, Fry played the lead in the film Wilde, was Melchett in the BBC television series Blackadder, starred as the title character Peter Kingdom in the ITV series Kingdom, has a recurring guest role as Dr. Gordon Wyatt on the Fox crime series Bones and appeared as rogue TV host Gordon Deitrich in the dystopian thriller V For Vendetta. He has also written and presented several documentary series including the 2008 television series Stephen Fry in America, which saw him travelling across all 50 US states. Since 2003 he has been the host of the quiz show QI.